The Dangers of Misinterpreting Recently Amended FRE 801(d)(1)(B)

Professor Laird C. Kirkpatrick and Professor Christopher B. Mueller · December 2016 84 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo 193 A recent amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(D)(1)(B) expands the situations in which prior consistent statements by testifying witnesses can be used as substantive evidence, and not merely as rehabilitating evidence. In this piece, the...
Read More

Salman v. United States: Stock Tips Make Bad Holiday Gifts

Salman v. United States, 580 U.S. ___ (2016) (Alito, J.). Response by Professor Randall D. Eliason Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2016) Slip Opinion | New York Times DealBook | SCOTUSblog Stock Tips Make Bad Holiday Gifts Insider trading is a particularly murky area of criminal law. Because no statute defines the...
Read More

When a Picture Is Not Worth a Thousand Words

Andreas Kuersten · November 2016 84 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo 179 It is frequently put forth that the admission of neuroimaging evidence at criminal trials introduces the substantial risk of these sophisticated and visual presentations unduly influencing factfinders. As such, this Essay analyzes how brain image evidence might have this effect. Particularly, it focuses...
Read More

On the Docket’s Preview of December Supreme Court Arguments

As the Supreme Court nears double digit months without a ninth Justice, the end may be in sight. Now that the election is over and President-elect Trump is beginning to fill his soon-to-be cabinet positions, judicial nomination buzz is warming up, and attention will be turning from the Senate’s blockage of Judge Merrick Garland’s nomination...
Read More

Panel 4: Consumer Contract Law

Panel 4: Consumer Contract Law Our final panel assessed the future of consumer contract law in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union.  The Honorable Carlos Lucero, Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit moderated the discussion featuring Professors Geraint Howells, City University of Hong Kong, and James...
Read More

Panel 3: Contract Interpretation and Good Faith

Panel 3: Contract Interpretation and Good Faith The George Washington University Law School’s Dean Blake Morant began the third panel, “Contract Interpretation and Good Faith” by introducing and welcoming Martin Hogg, Professor of the Law of Obligations from Edinburgh Law School; Robert Stevens, Herbert Smith Freehills Professor of English Private Law from the University of...
Read More

Panel 2: Contractual Remedies

Panel 2: Contractual Remedies Professor Martin Hogg, co-host of the Symposium and Professor of the Law of Obligations at Edinburgh Law School, introduced our esteemed panelists and moderated the second panel’s robust discussion of contractual remedies. Chen-Wishart, Professor of the Law of Contract and Associate Dean of Graduates at Oxford University, kicked off the conversation. ...
Read More

Panel 1: Share Economy and the Edges of Contract Law

Panel 1: Share Economy and the Edges of Contract Law The first panel of The George Washington Law Review Symposium was titled “Share Economy and the Edges of Contract Law.”  The panel addressed how the new sharing economy has tested (and continues to test) the bounds of contract law.  The panel approached this issue from...
Read More

Keynote Address by the Right Honorable Lord Patrick Hodge

Keynote Address by the Right Honorable Lord Patrick Hodge On November 19, 2016, the Right Honorable Lord Patrick Hodge delivered the Keynote Address at The George Washington Law Review’s Symposium, Divergence and Reform in the Common Law of Contracts.  Lord Hodge, Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, framed his remarks around the...
Read More