United States v. Texas: Ambush or Self-Inflicted Wound—Defending the Administration’s Deferred Action Program

United States v. Texas, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) (per curiam). Response by Alan Morrison Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2015) Slip Opinion | N.Y. Times | SCOTUSblog Ambush or Self-Inflicted Wound: Defending the Administration’s Deferred Action Program When federal judge Andrew Hanen enjoined the Obama Administration’s expanded deferred action program last February,1...
Read More

Utah v. Strieff: Concerning Implications for Our Privacy

Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) (Thomas, J.). Response by Edward J. George Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2015) Slip Opinion | New York Times | SCOTUSblog Concerning Implications for Our Privacy In Utah v. Strieff,1 the Court reversed Utah’s supreme court, holding that an arrest warrant can attenuate “the connection...
Read More

Utah v. Strieff: Chipping Away at the Exclusionary Rule

Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) (Thomas, J.). Response by Stephen Saltzburg Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2015) Slip Opinion | New York Times | SCOTUSblog Chipping Away at the Exclusionary Rule The Supreme Court’s decision in Utah v. Strieff,1 on June 20, 2016, looks at first blush like a minor limit...
Read More

Williams v. Pennsylvania: Justice Doesn’t Just Happen

Williams v. Pennsylvania, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) (Kennedy, J.). Response by Robin Maher Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2015) Slip Opinion | New York Times | SCOTUSblog Justice Doesn’t Just Happen The extraordinary facts in Williams v. Pennsylvania1 read like a Hollywood movie script. On one side was the prosecutor-turned-judge who sat...
Read More