Nathaniel Schwamm 92 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1182 Justiciability doctrines are intertwined with constitutional commands and prudential concerns. They weave together text and history; they aim to protect democracy and individual rights. In 2019, the Supreme Court, in Rucho v. Common Cause, determined that partisan gerrymandering claims suffer from justiciability problems by implicating a doctrinal... Read More

Eitan Sirkovich 92 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1163 President Biden’s Executive Order 14,094, Modernizing Regulatory Review, continues the line of presidential directives dating back to the Reagan Administration that centralize the President’s control over administrative agencies’ regulatory processes. Its express purpose is to ensure well-reasoned, high-quality regulations, but it affords no private right of action... Read More

Anita S. Krishnakumar 92 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1117 The major questions doctrine has undergone a sea change in prominence within the span of two years. In the ten months between August 2021 and June 2022, the Court invoked the canon three times, using it aggressively to invalidate some of the signature policies implemented by... Read More

Daniel T. Deacon 92 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1050 Ever since the Supreme Court’s 1947 decision in SEC v. Chenery Corporation, known as Chenery II, agencies have enjoyed wide latitude to develop policy through individual adjudications in addition to rulemaking. Chenery II has never been completely uncontroversial, and in recent years, calls to overturn or... Read More

In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overruled Chevron as inconsistent with the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), which requires courts to decide “all relevant questions of law” and therefore prohibits them from deferring to agency interpretations because the relevant statutory language is ambiguous. A different approach now governs judicial review of the countless routine, often specialized questions of statutory interpretation that agencies answer in the normal course of implementing their statutes—the “ordinary” questions.