Home > Article > Is Efficient Copyright a Reasonable Goal?

Is Efficient Copyright a Reasonable Goal?

Stan J. Liebowitz · September 2011
79 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 1692 (2011)

If we could create an economically efficient copyright law, would we want to do so? This Essay argues that society should not favor an economically efficient copyright law. As this Essay describes, a social welfare-maximizing copyright law amounts to an attempt to restrict the economic profit (rents) going to creators to no more than the amount which is required to induce the creator to produce the work. A perfectly ideal and flexible copyright law would remove all rents going to all creators. Elsewhere in the economy, however, we do not find government policies attempting to remove rents from labor. It does not, therefore, seem “right” or “fair” or “just” to remove the rents for just one category of labor—workers in what are sometimes termed the “creative” industries, comprising music, the arts, movies, and so forth. Maximizing social welfare in copyright amounts to a government intrusion into labor incomes, an outcome considered unacceptable in other parts of the economy.

You may also like
Making “Smart Growth” Smarter
Reasonable but Unconstitutional: Racial Profiling and the Radical Objectivity of Whren v. United States
Killing For Your Dog
Party Subordinance in Federal Litigation