It Could Have Been Worse, But a Statute Designed to “Break Down All Discrimination” Against African Americans Deserves Better than Comcast Corporation v. National Association of African American-Owned Media
The year after the Civil War, the federal government made a commitment to Black people in this country. In simple but sweeping language, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 mandates that “[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right . . . to make and enforce contracts . . . as is enjoyed by white citizens.”
Implicit Racial Bias and the Perpetrator Perspective: A Response to Reasonable but Unconstitutional
Professor L. Song Richardson 83 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.1008 In their Article, Reasonable but Unconstitutional: Racial Profiling and the Radical Objectivity of... Read More
Doctrine, Discretion, and Discrimination: A Response to Professor Richardson
Professor Gabriel J. Chin 83 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.1023 Professor Richardson has presented a characteristically insightful and gracious analysis of the critique... Read More
Response: Opacity, Complexity, and Self-Regulation in Investment Banking
Professor Alan D. Morrison & Professor William J. Wilhelm, Jr · April 2015 83 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo 1 Response to Andrew... Read More
Rulemaking Ossification Is Real: A Response to Testing the Ossification Thesis
Richard J. Pierce, Jr. · July 2012 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 1493 (2012) This Article responds to Testing the Ossification Thesis,... Read More